|
| |
|
|
| |
 |
|
|
 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| A
Proud Past
|
|
|
Part III -
Coming
of Age
|
|
|
Both Army Aviation and the
helicopter came of age during the
conflict in southeast Asia. From the
arrival in Vietnam of the first Army
helicopter units in December 1961 until
the completion of the disengagement and
Vietnamization processes in 1973, it was
America's "Helicopter War."
The most widely used
helicopter, the UH-1 Iroquois or Huey,
began to arrive in Vietnam in significant
numbers in 1964; before the end of the
conflict, more than 5,000 of these
versatile aircraft were introduced into
southeast Asia. They were used for
medical evacuation, command and control,
and air assault; to transport personnel
and materiel; and as gun ships. The AH-1
Cobra arrived in 1967 to partially
replace the Huey in its gun ship
capacity. Other important helicopters in
Vietnam included the CH-47 Chinook, the
OH-6 Cayuse, the OH-58 Kiowa, and the CH-
54 Tarhe.
|
|
 |
Although the concept of airmobility had
been developed with a mid-intensity
European conflict in mind, Army Aviation
and the helicopter had proven themselves
during the low intensity conflict in
southeast Asia. Afterwards, the Army
turned its major attention back to the
threat of a mid or high intensity
conflict in Europe, and doubts reemerged
about the value of helicopters in that
sort of arena.
Some military leaders believed that the
helicopter could not survive and perform
an essential role in a heavy combat
environment. In order to gain general
acceptance and ensure further success,
Army Aviation continued to develop new
doctrine, tactics, aircraft, equipment,
and organizational structure. New or
radically modified aircraft adopted
during the early 1980s consisted of the
AH-64 Apache, the UH-60 Black Hawk, and
the OH- 58D version of the Kiowa.
The creation, implementation, and
consolidation of the Army Aviation Branch
dominated the 1980s. Prominent aviators
as well as other Army leaders had debated
the establishment of aviation as a
separate branch since the time of the
Korean conflict.
The opposition to a separate aviation
branch had resulted in part from Army
attitudes regarding the Army Air Corps
and the U.S. Air Force. In Army circles,
both of these aviation organizations were
believed to have been unreliable in
performing their mission of supporting
the ground forces--even after having been
given resources to do so. Since Army
Aviation had demonstrated its commitment
to the support of the ground battle in
Vietnam, however, opposition to a
separate aviation branch began to wane.
Also, Army Aviation had grown in size and
technological sophistication. This growth
caused increasingly complex problems in
training, procurement, doctrine
development, proponent responsibility,
and personnel management. Many
non-aviators as well as aviators became
convinced that these problems could be
solved more effectively by the creation
of an aviation branch.
Both DA and TRADOC conducted extensive
studies of the separate- branch question
during the early 1980s. By 1983, there
was a near consensus among Army leaders,
and the Secretary of the Army signed an
order creating the Army Aviation Branch,
with an effective date of 12 April 1983.
Aviation officer basic and advanced
courses were begun at Fort Rucker in
1984, and a gradual consolidation of
aviation-related activities followed. In
1986, the U.S. Army ATC Activity became
part of the branch; the following year,
an NCO academy was established at Fort
Rucker. In 1988, the Army Aviation
Logistics School, which had been
dependent on the Transportation Center at
Fort Eustis, was incorporated into the
Aviation Branch.
Also in 1988, the Army Aviation
Modernization Plan was given final
approval and implemented. The
modernization plan called for a gradual
reduction in the number of Army aircraft
as older models were replaced by modern
ones. Aircraft adopted or planned during
the late 1980s and early 1990s included
the OH-58D Kiowa Warrior, the RAH-66
Comanche, and a new training helicopter.
Army Aviation's role of providing the
indispensable vertical dimension to the
modern battlefield has come to be
universally recognized. For example,
during operations in Grenada, Panama, and
the Persian Gulf region, Army Aviation
played major and decisive roles.
One of the very first blows of Operation
Desert Storm was struck by Army Aviation.
Apache helicopters destroyed Iraqi early
warning sites shortly before allied bombs
began exploding over Baghdad. Then,
during the 100 hours of ground combat,
Army helicopters dominated night-time
operations.
The decreased military budgets following
the end of the Cold War forced both the
Army and Army Aviation to downsize. Army
Aviation's response was to develop the
"Aviation Restructure
Initiative," a plan to decrease the
size of the force while continuing to
meet its mission and also overcoming
existing deficiencies. The ARI aims to
accomplish these goals through continued
modernization of the fleet and
reorganization of the force.
The post-Cold War environment provides
new opportunities for Army Aviation to
serve our country. Aviation is uniquely
qualified for infiltration,
reconnaissance, evacuation, and strike
missions of unconventional warfare.
Because of its unique combination of
versatility, deployability, and
lethality, Army Aviation is assuming
additional missions and functions in the
rapidly changing world of the new
millennium.
|
|
 |
|
|
| |
Part
I
|
Part
II
| Part
III
|
|
|
|
|