Army Aviation Museum        

 

 

Return to U.S. Army Aviation Museum Homepage Enjoy a virtual tour of the Army Aviation Museum: get helpfulI information to help plan your trip to the Army Aviation Museum - learn about the Museum's history - get a sneak peek of our  major exhibits, and explore the Museum's collection of aircraft Take an exciting journey through Army Aviation's Proud Past. Learn about the Army Aviation Museum Foundation, Inc. and how you can join in the efforts to preserve Army Aviation's proud heritage! Your One Stop source for Army Aviation inspired merchandise. Shopping is 100% secure and each purchase helps support a national treasure. Sign and view our Guestbook Visit other Army Aviation related sites How to contact the Army Aviation Museum Real People - Real Heroes. Flightlines is a database of personal histories, Medal of Honor recipients, and units submitted to the Flightlines program
  United States Army Aviation Museum - preserving the Past... for the future!
United States Army Aviation
     
 
Cubs in Combat


This article, written by Brigadier General Carl I. Hutton, USA, originally appeared in the Army Aviation Digest, Vol. 1, No. 3 (March ’55) and appeared again in Vol. 3, No. 6 (June ’57)..


The following are extracts from a memoir entitled "An Armored Artillery Commander," written specifically to be placed in the Artillery School Library, Fort Sill, Oklahoma. They are perhaps largely of academic interest, but they do pertain to one man’s recollection of, and options about, the operations of Army Airplanes in combat. We have too little of such material.

Every war has its own circumstances. The Western European campaigns in World War II were fought against an enemy who was heavily engaged on two other land fronts and who had suffered severe defeats on both. He was no longer a first class fighting power. General lessons about combat must be tempered with knowledge of the particular situation. – Author.


14th Armored FA Battalion – 1944

June 14 marked the entry into combat of our air OPs. These had been on the Division Artillery airstrip since they flew across the channels in formation, guided by an Air Force airplane. Since there had been fairly low clouds the day of the movement to Carentan, somebody at the division artillery airstrip decided our planes could not join us. This was one of the characteristic mistakes which occurs when the airplanes are under the control of someone other than the man who is going to use them.

If the airplanes had been with us for the second attack on the afternoon of the thirteenth, it might have been possible to have detected any rearward movement of the enemy after he had felt the full force of the attack. On the fourteenth the air observers had fine shooting, especially since the Germans were not yet accustomed to seeing the airplanes in the air, and measuring their effectiveness by the artillery fire which fell upon them when they exposed themselves. At any rate, from this time on I struggled to have my airplanes with me, although not always with success…

June 17: The air OPs had proven their effectiveness and their ability to observe counter-battery fire, as well as to detect other targets in the Bocage country…

June 3: (Diary Entry) "Thank God for the Cubs. Keep Jerry down"

July 1-18: (Caumont) Our air OPs were again proving their worth. The air sections located their landing strip perhaps a mile in rear of the command post. Because of the conformation of the front, however, (we occupied the front left-hand corner of a sharp salient) they were not very far from the enemy. In spite of low approaches which they made to the landing field, they were occasionally shelled. On one occasion, Lieutenant Fein and Sergeant Pechar, becoming irritated at this discourtesy, took off under shell fire and did some fine shooting back. The good which the airplanes did was not limited to the negative benefit of holding down hostile fire. Again and again they proved their worth in locating hostile guns. At dusk, this was especially easy since the flashes of the guns were very distinct…

July 4: I flew an air mission over the front to check on the work of the observers. After seeing the enemy side of the lines from the air, I tended to put more faith than ever in the air OPs. They were really looking right down the enemy’s throat. No big movement could have taken place close to the enemy lines in the daytime without it being detected from the air. After repeated missions over the same front, the observers became so familiar with the front that adjustments on targets were frequently unnecessary. They could tell the coordinates with remarkable exactness…

July 5: (Diary Entry) "Good air observation from 2200 to 2300…"

July 18-19: An incident during the relief from the Caumont front convinced me that my airplanes were justified. The whole relief was an echelon affair, with the 14th Field Artillery moving out last. Division artillery moved out during the day and the air officer took my air section with him. Although this was simply a misunderstanding, it demonstrated the possibility of a misunderstanding, and I of course did not fail to point out to Colonel Roberts that I did not like it. He agreed, and always from then until his death, made a point of letting me have my own airplanes...

July 25: (St. Lo Breakthrough) The air OPs were to operate independently under each battalion commander since we were again limited by the lack of interchangeability of the radios…

July 26- August 1: (Tessy-Sur-Vire) The air OPs in this fight gave us about the only real observed fire we had. The forward observers were hemmed in by the trees and hedgerows and could not see beyond their immediate front. The German artillery was behind the ridge and with observation all along the line of our attack. The air observers did a fine job, in spite of almost constant sniping at them by 88mm antiaircraft guns.

On one occasion, we managed to save General Rose, who was pinned down by artillery fire, by the efforts of Lieutenant Fein and Sergeant Pechar. Toward dusk on this day, they were having wonderful shooting at the hostile artillery, but they reported they were about out of gasoline, and would have to come down. Of course, I told them to stay up and keep up the shooting. Finally, it got too dark for them to see, and they headed for the airstrip. They ran out of gasoline on their final approach, and had to make a night forced landing.

During part of the battle, Captain Dyson was acting as observer with the 1st Battalion, 66th. He switched his radio to the battalion air channel, and by talking back and forth with the air observer, managed to get effective fire on his front. As far as I know, this was the first time this obvious and effective coordination between the air OPs and forward observers was used. It was an excellent scheme.

It had the disadvantage of focusing the attention of the air observer on this small part of the front to the exclusion of the others. It worked out so well that we soon started the same system with all our observers, under the control of the S-3, to prevent one observer from hogging all of the observation…


World War II

Overview

Grasshoppers

Baptism by Fire

Cubs in Combat

POW

 

Page: 1 | 2 | 3
 

This page last updated: 1/2/03
Copyright 2003 | All Rights Reserved

U.S. Army Aviation Museum Foundation, Inc.
P.O. Box 620610-0610, Fort Rucker, AL 36330
1-334-598-2508

www.armyavnmuseum.org
E-mail Inquiries